What was dual authority




















Massage Therapy. Pest Control. Australian Law. Business Law. California Bar Exam. Civil Procedure. Constitutional Law. Contract Law. Corporate Law. Criminal Law. Florida Bar Exam. Insurance Law. Intellectual Property. International Law. Legal Studies. Pharmacy Law. Property Law. Real Estate Law.

Texas Bar Exam. Alternative Medicine. Health Class. Health Science. Human Development. Mental Health. Public Health. ACE Health Coach.

Real Estate. Computer Programming. Computer Science. Graphic Design. Information Security. Information Technology. Management Information Systems. Culinary Arts. Art History. Other Fine Arts. Cultural Literacy. Knowledge Rehab. National Capitals.

People You Should Know. Sports Trivia. Loading flashcards What did the Grand Duke Mikhail do? He claimed political authority to assemble a "Provisional Government". Who was the Provisional Government under?

Who was Prince Lvov? A wealthy aristocrat and zemstvo leader. What did the Provisional Governments members represent? A cross-section of the influential elites and comprised those who had formerly favoured constitutional monarchy liberals, moderate socialsts and Kadets.

What was the Provisional Government there for? The Petrograd Soviet, drawing its membership from socialist deputies elected in factories and regiments, coordinated the activities of other Soviets that sprang up across Russia at this time.

The Bolshevik faction of the latter party provided the opposition. While representing the interests of Russia's working classes, the Petrograd Soviet at first did not seek to undermine the Provisional Government's authority directly. Nevertheless, the Petrograd Soviet's "Order No.

The Provisional Government, in contrast to the socialist Petrograd Soviet, chiefly represented the propertied classes. Headed by ministers of a moderate or liberal bent, the new government pledged to convene a constituent assembly that would usher in a new era of bourgeois democracy. The government did not take up the matter of land redistribution, however, leaving it for the constituent assembly. Even more damaging, the ministers favored keeping Russia's military commitments to its allies, a position that became increasingly unpopular as the war dragged on.

The government suffered its first crisis in the "April Days," when demonstrations against the government's annexationist war aims forced two ministers to resign, leading to the appointment of moderate socialist Aleksandr Kerensky as war minister.

Proclamations were adopted to thunderous applause in the hall, but important decisions continued to be made by the intellectuals of the Executive Committee. On 1 March 14 March it presented the government with a list of conditions for its support. The Provisional Government had little choice but to consent. No mention was made of the major issues of war and land distribution on which the Provisional Government and Soviet could not agree, or of the legal status of the Petrograd Soviet.

The standard characterisation of Dual Power is that while the Provisional Government had the responsibility of running the country, the Petrograd Soviet controlled the actual levers of power, such as the troops, railways and telegraph service. At a stroke the order damaged government influence over the army and further weakened discipline within regiments.

In addition, without a compromise with the Soviet the government was impotent in the face of the clamour for land reform from peasants and soldiers and could not rely on the masses to support the war effort to which it was committed. In practice, of course, there was not a neat division between the two centres of power. Until the Bolsheviks gained control of the Soviet Executive in September, however, the Executive would not countenance assuming power itself, even when crowds of protestors demanded it did.

This was partly due to party dogma. Mensheviks in particular adhered rigidly to Marxist theory that a bourgeois revolution and a long period of capitalism and democracy were preconditions for socialist power. Soviet leaders, moreover, feared counter-revolution and civil war should they proclaim themselves in power. Historians such as Tsuyoshi Hasegawa have also suggested that, while the Petrograd Soviet exercised more power over the masses than the former Duma leaders, it could not be certain of its authority.

It could not command cohesive military forces or comprehensive administrative machinery. The power of the Soviet rested in the masses who rallied behind it, and Soviet leaders feared the violence of the masses would turn against them should they become the government.

Scholars focusing on the situation outside Petrograd have challenged the traditional characterisation of Dual Power. Sarah Badcock has argued that Soviet and Provisional Government administrations in Nizhnii Novgorod and the surrounding province of Nizhegorod and in Kazan did not display divisions of power along the lines of the capital and worked closely together until the Bolshevik seizure of power. In Smolensk, according to Michael Hickey, hybrid institutions formed under pressure from local popular organisations.

In fact, Orlando Figes maintains, the period between February and October was marked by a breakdown of all central power. Both the Provisional Government and the Petrograd Soviet had limited control over the revolution in the provinces, where all manner of ad hoc committees sprang up to replace the tsarist administration.

In the regions this was not so much a period of Dual Power as one of a multitude of powers. Peeling, Siobhan: Dual Power , in: online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War, ed. DOI :



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000