The main difference is that, in theory, iStock is a microstock service, and Getty Images a stock one. Microstock: more sales, less price, usually all royalty free. An image subscription lets you enjoy our lowest prices on photos, vectors and illustrations by paying a flat rate to access a set limit of downloads every month. Depending on the subscription plan you choose, you can get access to more images in total and more downloads per month.
Buying an individual stock photo using credit packages Stock photos can be purchased with one credit but the minimum number of credits that can be purchased is 5 to 12 credits depending on the agency. But it also includes the higher value images otherwise not found in the microstock market. Royalty-free licenses let you pay once to use copyrighted images and video clips in personal and commercial projects on an ongoing basis without requiring additional payments each time you use that content.
Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel. Cover Letter. Ben Davis February 2, With Basic plans you can only download the content form Essentials collection, but with Premium plans you can download content from both, Essentials and Signature collection. You can purchase either Basic or Premium subscription plans in 4 sizes of 10, 25, 50, and images, with the largest plans being the most cost-efficient meaning the lowest price per image.
In the table below, there are 5 columns. The first one, Images , represents the number of downloads you get each month. Credit packs require no commitment and are a great option to get assets that are not included within subscription plans — videos and extended licenses.
By purchasing credit packs, you acquire credits, which are the currency of iStock that you can use to buy images, videos, and Extended license. Essential and Signature images cost 1 and 3 credits, while videos cost 6 and 18 credits, respectively.
You can purchase credits with several Credit packs that differ in size and price — the larger the Credit pack, the more you save. However, you must not reproduce it more than , times, resell it, or use it on its own it must be a part of a larger design. When you need a higher reproduction rate, want to share an image with more coworkers, or you require higher legal indemnification, you can use credits to purchase an Extended license.
They have websites in many different languages that will help you navigate usage laws across country borders. The site is easy to search and browse for high-concept imagery, videography, and sound.
You can expect high-quality photos for the price too. They have a live chat and phone support should you need it and an easy-to-use checkout process. Shutterstock is a good resource for high-resolution images, especially for large-format designs billboards and other print media. They offer various subscription plans to meet different user needs, making their pricing model more flexible than most other high-res photo options. They carry stock photos, videos, illustrations, vector, and audio files.
Shutterstock is a great choice for agencies, publications, and companies with the frequent need to use high-quality photos and illustrations. Must contact Shutterstock for pricing. Read Our Full Review of Shutterstock. This table is a resource that compares the most popular stock photo websites. Use it to help you make an informed decision when deciding on a stock photography resource. The other stock photography services we reviewed are listed below.
Learn more about what each of these services offers as well as the pros and cons. Adobe Stock was previously known as Fotolia by Adobe.
In Adobe, the popular graphic design software company, released its own stock photography library with millions of photos, illustrations, and vector images.
You can also submit your images to sell, which makes sense and is convenient since they cater to the creative community and have a built-in network of graphic design and photographer customers. Adobe Stock is still in the early stages, so we will have to give them more time to see where they fit in our rankings. Alamy has one of the largest selections of images, with more than 80, new stock images added daily and sourced from around the world from countries.
The result is a wide range of culturally diverse photos from all geographic landscapes and areas, giving you millions of high-quality images from which to choose. Alamy only sells per image, so no subscription plans are available, and the price varies depending on the size and the rights of the photo. You can choose to have it licensed, which can get expensive depending on what you are using it for.
Or, you can select the rights-managed option, which allows for limited-use and limited-time for a photo. Can Stock Photo adds 25, stock media pieces to their site every day and offers a good value for low-resolution photos. They also have videos. However, they do not have audio files, and their library is much smaller than many of their competitors. Corbis is no longer operating under its brand name.
This is good news for you since Getty is our 1 pick. Since , Dreamstime has provided a vast selection of high-quality digital images at affordable prices to connect image sellers with buyers. All images are reviewed and approved by experienced editors to ensure quality control. In addition to photos, they have a library of free images, clip art, and vectors and have multiple incentives for photographers and users alike. They also offer monthly plans or pay-per-photo credit packages.
Foap is a relatively new service and concept that allows anyone to sell photos taken from their iPhone. Users can download the app, take a picture, upload it to the Foap market, and list it for sale.
New to Foap is a Brand Brief that allows marketers to submit their needs for lifestyle and product photos, then task the Foap community to create content for them based on the guidelines. Since then, Getty has struck up a deal with Google that allows Google Drivers to use its photos in their work, paying only a relatively minor one-time fee.
Again, as FC points out , compared to iStockphoto, which gives photographers 15 percent of sales and as much as 45 percent of exclusive sales, and Shutterstock which offers 20 to 30 percent royalties, the share that Stocksy doles should look pretty attractive to photographers. Hard to beat that. Livingstone says that photographers have continuously sought him out to tell him how tough the industry is and how unfavorable the terms are for artists on most digital photography sites.
The model has already attracted people like Sean Locke, who Fast Company says had nearly one million license sales on iStockphoto until the company ended the relationship because he had criticized the Google Drive partnership , he explained on his blog.
Instead, Stocksy will prioritize quality over quantity, screening each image before it goes on the site.
0コメント